Subject	UH, i beg to differ...
Posted by	nixit(da][as) on September 26, 2001 at 11:29 PM
	This message has been viewed 36 times.
In Reply To	It reduces the chance of detonation by lowering the >> posted by AshsZ (Retired) on September 26, 2001 at 11:14 PM
Message	"Becuase it lowers the chance of detonation, you can up your boost and make more power than you would have before." say compression is "1.00" and you can boost 16 psi and get 400 rwhp (yes, i know...just hang in ther). if you lower compression to "0.90", you will need 19 psi to get the same rwhp. by doing this, you lose alot(!) of torque, especially low end. I personally would only recommend lowering compression if you are running insane amounts of boost. but for our normal bolt on turbos, i don't believe it is a big issue. (IMHO!) (IMHO) ___aim: nixit911____icq: 17694360___ 1991 nissan Z32SS (stage 6+, but broke) 1993 corvette 40th (stage stock) 1993 jeep wrangler (stage *very* badass) "Friends, Romans, forum members. I have come to bury the pulley, not to praise it. The evil that the pulley does lives after it. The good is oft interred with destroyed rod bearings." -JRH(KY)
Follow Ups	Pros/Cons of copper head gaskets? - AshsZ (Retired) 22:28:32 09/26/01 copper if most desirable. - nixit(da][as) 22:33:01 09/26/01 I see. Retorque them tho? Pulling plenum is a 12pack ordeal - AshsZ (Retired) 22:35:19 09/26/01 You are really _suppose_ to do that regardless of which hg. (n/m) - DamonH 90TT 22:40:37 09/26/01 yup...more... - nixit(da][as) 22:41:45 09/26/01 Nice. Damon suggests doing stock HG tho, I'm sure it wont - AshsZ (Retired) 22:46:11 09/26/01 the stock Head Gasket is good for 500+ RWHP. - nixit(da][as) 22:50:07 09/26/01 [foot in mouth], 500 may be the real high side...400 = safe (n/m) - nixit(da][as) 22:51:09 09/26/01 yes they are for the Twin Turbo motor.. - Carlos Ramirez 22:51:15 09/26/01 very true. Mal1ce is having his custom made too... - nixit(da][as) 22:52:21 09/26/01 Copper is also cheaper ... once your block is o-ringed. (n/m) - DamonH 90TT 22:41:22 09/26/01 here are a few cons.. from there website - Carlos Ramirez 22:55:21 09/26/01 I mean pros.. duh!! (n/m) - Carlos Ramirez 22:56:48 09/26/01 Is it good to lower the compression, how does that help? (n/m) - 95zTT 23:11:38 09/26/01 It reduces the chance of detonation by lowering the >> - AshsZ (Retired) 23:14:31 09/26/01 UH, i beg to differ... - nixit(da][as) 23:29:58 09/26/01 Why, of course you do. :) >>>> read >>>> - AshsZ (Retired) 00:00:48 09/27/01 Interesting Post. (n/m) - nixit(da][as) 00:12:36 09/27/01 and where do you get those stats? - 97 S14 00:36:43 09/27/01 The table was "rough", only used to show a relationship. - AshsZ (Retired) 01:03:27 09/27/01 There are more factors... >> - MikeeZ 09:20:32 09/27/01 Yup. I didn't mention those factors tho, >> - AshsZ (Retired) 15:43:15 09/27/01 actually by lowering your compression you don't loose that - Carlos Ramirez 06:46:16 09/27/01 Yes. Less compression=less heat of compression. (n/m) - Buzz 04:07:27 09/27/01 Drool Drool. I'm sold, F* it, I'm tearing her apart. (n/m) - AshsZ (Retired) 23:12:53 09/26/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.